Premium RG8X CB Coax - 9' or 18'

$14.95

Availability:

In Stock

* Required Fields

Quick Overview

RG8X coax is a step up from standard RG-58 coaxial and is recommended for high-powered applications or users who simply want the best coax possible. A 95%+ shielding rating prevents signal leak and outside interference, resulting in longer transmission range and a clearer signal. The cable's hand-soldered, quality PL-259 ends are less likely to break or short than molded ends. Constructed a bit thicker than standard RG-58 cable, RG8X is recommended for situations where the coax may see higher-than-average wear or when a stouter cable is desired. If you want the best, the RG8X CB coax is your choice.

RG-8X CB Coaxial Cable PL-259

Double click on above image to view full picture

Double click on above image to view full picture

Zoom Out
Zoom In

More Views

  • RG-8X CB Coaxial Cable PL-259

Additional Information

Model / SKU: Belden or Comparable RG8X
Coax Type: RG-8X (Premium Single)
Connection Type: PL-259
Product Details: 95%+ shielding rating
Quality, hand-soldered PL-259 ends
Thick, 24" diameter build
Stranded center
9' or 18' long
Dual PL-259 ends
Compatible with: All CB radios and mount studs that accept a PL-259 coax connection. For most uses, we recommend 18' over 9' because the longer cable is more resistant to performance and installations problems. The 9' length doesn't cause problems, but 18' lengths tend to work better when installation issues arise, which is why we recommend them.

Product Tags

Use spaces to separate tags. Use single quotes (') for phrases.

Customer Reviews

Very good

Review by Jcol320
Overall Rating
This is really good! It really helped my low SWR reading and the overall performance of my CB.
(Posted on November 27, 2012)
Do you find this review helpful?  Yes No

RG8x CB Coax

Review by Ank
Overall Rating
This was shipped with the Maco V5000 and it looked like it was dragged on the ground. Some of the shielding was thin but when I installed them, it seems to be fine. (Posted on September 10, 2012)
Do you find this review helpful?  Yes No
(1 of 1 people found this review helpful)